“Freethinking” may be popular, but it’s an oxymoron as so-called freethinkers exclude things they won’t talk about or consider (god). Many free-thinkers are the most closed-minded people we’ve ever met — freethinking being an oxymoron as a mind works like a parachute, it only functions when open.

A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.

No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.

That obviously causes a logical problem, and becomes an oxymoron; you can’t think freely if you’re excluding areas of consideration. So let’s try something else:

A person who forms opinions on the basis of reason, independent of authority or tradition, esp. a person whose religious opinions differ from established belief.

The phrase “differ from established belief” still excludes areas of exploration, so thus can’t be truly freethinking; let’s use the following definition for freethinker, which passes logical muster:

A freethinker forms opinions on the basis of reason and logic.

If we use that definition, most sane people will agree thinking for yourself is a good thing; don’t get sucked in by group-think (notice atheists can’t be free-thinkers as atheists abandon critical thinking to hold logically absurd beliefs, and place limits on what they’ll consider).

A dog, a horse, and Superman walk into a bar… Not a joke, it’s a special article I wrote titled “Animal Magnetism,” ONLY available to subscribers. Gosh, it’s free too! GET IT TODAY by entering your primary email address below. Quit anytime, it’s risk-free!

Copyright ©Frames of Reference LLC 1998–2018

Printed from