Evolution

Carl Sagan provides many quotes loved by both atheists and evolutionists in an attempt to demonstrate the absurdity of God and religion in general. Yet Sagan himself also demonstrates how absurd his position was, as he contradicts his own idea.

Archaeopteryx and Ida prove not to be what evolutionists hoped for. As new evidence comes in, don’t fall for every claim evolution puts forth - remember piltdown man?

Richard Dawkins proves the existence of God in interview. As a staunch God-denier, we’re sure he didn’t mean to, but he did.

Can science abandon the scientific method and proclaim truth by fiat? One field of “science” makes the attempt, as one popular writer argues.

You’ll hear both atheists and evolutionists point to something as a mistake by God as a reason for denying God’s existence and creation. But are those really mistakes, or a lack of human understanding?

Does Evolution have data to support it? So many people claim “overwhelming evidence” for the theory, but consider what happens when they’re asked to produce it.

New data shows again how evolution changes frequently. Something taught for decades as fact turns out to be false. Of course, that makes sense when you realize no scientific (repeatable, verifiable experimental data) exists for evolution.

The universe is not eternal; it had a beginning. So how did we get here? Two different views exist, and which you accept depends on your views of God.

The scientific method is the basis for all science and consists of making observations, then predictions, and then experiments to prove or disprove the hypothesis. All science follows this method except one – evolution is the one area failing to follow the foundational principle of all science. Evolutionists claim overwhelming evidence for their theory, but is it scientific? If it doesn’t follow the scientific method with repeatable, verifiable experimental data, it’s not science and should be left for philosophy courses.

Evolutionists draw conclusions about probability using a deck of cards. Unfortunately, they have significant errors in their analysis - actually, their example proves evolution is impossible. Allow Nobel prize Physicist Richard Feynman to illustrate the exact error.

Does evolution explain the origins of life? This is a field changing rapidly as new discoveries are made — not too many years ago, it was popular to believe the universe was infinitely old, but today the latest discoveries show that to be false. What discoveries are around the corner? Darwin himself raised objections to his theory, have new discoveries shed light on the theory?

Science claims the earth is 13.7 billion years old. Many Christians state the earth is only 6,000 years old? Do science and the Bible contradict each other? Or is the Bible in error? How accurate is science and the Bible, and can we reconcile these positions?