Atheism

Atheists frequently don’t recognize contradictions while attempting to defend the logical inconsistencies created by atheism. Atheists claim there is no God; after the statement is made (usually as an unproven “fact”), and the logical contradictions of that statement are pointed out to them, instead of admitting they made an error they go to great lengths to disavow the problem.

Errors in logic must be avoided if you wish to have an open mind and use critical thinking. This of course means you must be open to all possibilities, forming opinions based on logic and analysis instead of preconceived ideas; confirmation bias can arise during analysis by making assumptions based on what you want to see, instead of evidence and logical deduction.

Carl Sagan provides many quotes loved by both atheists and evolutionists in an attempt to demonstrate the absurdity of God and religion in general. Yet Sagan himself also demonstrates how absurd his position was, as he contradicts his own idea.

Final summary of atheism problems and the solution to them.

Final conclusions for the problems of atheism.

Evolution doesn’t work because it can’t explain information which is by definition non-random.

The broader question the atheist must solve is “How did I get here?”

Freethinking may be popular, but it also runs into logical problems the way it’s commonly defined.

In contrast to the atheist, the agnostic does have a logical position.

In spite of claims to the contrary, Atheism is by definition illogical and maintains an illogical position.

What is an atheist? How is the term defined?

Atheism creates many logical problems the atheist wishes to sweep away. Examine a few problems the atheist faces, and dive into the broader question — how did I get here? Where am I going? Why am I here?

According to atheist morality, morals are not absolute but shift with society. Why then do atheists protest over Christmas displays, when society overwhelmingly approves of them? Atheists don’t appear to follow their own moral view.

Without any absolute reference, where does the atheist obtain their morality? Do they have any? Or does it depend on each person individually?

Attempts by atheists to justify their dogma always come up short, as claiming “There is no God” is a logical absurdity. Another attempt fails - see if you can spot the error as an exercise in critical thinking before reading the answer.

Does lack of proof for God mean no God exists?

In Part I we discussed the logical reason why the problem of evil isn’t a problem. In Part II we’ll analyze the argument itself, and see why it falls flat as well. In short, the problem of evil … isn’t.

Richard Dawkins proves the existence of God in interview. As a staunch God-denier, we’re sure he didn’t mean to, but he did.

The atheist claims a logical problem exists with a loving all-powerful God and the existence of evil. Unfortunately the atheist finds themselves once again using faulty logic.

So-called “scholars” may lack basic logical and Biblical analysis skills, so do not depend on accolades to give credibility to theories. As an example, a book by a “renowned Bible scholar” has come under fire … by an atheist. Yet we’ll agree with the atheist the “renowned Bible scholar” uses bogus “scholarship”, in spite of their title. Be vary careful not to believe whatever the “scholars” tell you, just because they have titles after their name.

Examining C.S. Lewis’ argument against Jesus being a good moral teacher - but not God. The popular option of Jesus being a good teacher, but not God is illogical in light of the claims of Jesus.